Publication Date

Summer 2004


[Excerpt] My comments here reflect ten degrees of difference. While I mostly agree with him, I think Early takes a valid critique a step too far with jibes about red carpet treatment, Mormon missionaries, the best and the brightest, mobile organizers, self- sacrificing souls, and the like, suggesting that any reliance on graduates is a mistake, and only indigenous staffers should build the labor movement. His only exception, it appears, is for graduates going into workplaces where Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU)–style dissident groups take on their national union leadership, replicating the “colonizing” of the late 1960s worker-student alliance. As Early says, students’ entry into trade union work then was mostly “in opposition to the labor establishment of that era.” I take him to argue that students now aspiring to trade union work should follow the same dissident path rather than seek union staff positions.


Suggested Citation
Compa, L. (2004). More thoughts on the worker-student alliance: A response to Steve Early [Electronic version]. Labor: Studies in Working Class History of the Americas 1(2), 15-22.

Required Publisher Statement Copyright by the author; originally published by Duke University Press.

Included in

Unions Commons