<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Research Studies and Reports</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Cornell University ILR School All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports</link>
<description>Recent documents in Research Studies and Reports</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 01:36:37 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	







<item>
<title>Overcoming the Challenges to Organizing in Manufacturing</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/47</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/47</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:43:47 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] By 2002, the decline of organizing in the U.S. manufacturing sector has reached crisis proportions. In the 1930s it was industrial organizing that built the labor movement and brought a decent standard of living to millions of industrial workers, their families, and communities across the country. Absent intensive efforts to organize the nation's most mobile industries, U.S. workers will lose their only hedge against the worst effects of the global economy, and American manufacturing employers will lead the race to the bottom in workplace democracy, wages, working conditions, and living standards. The American labor movement needs its industrial base in order to regain both union density and the political and economic power that goes with it. The question is not whether manufacturing will disappear in the U.S., for there will always be goods produced in this country; the question is what kinds of manufacturing jobs those will be and whether they will be unionized.</p>
<p>It is because of this crisis that the AFL-CIO asked us to research the current state of organizing in manufacturing and make recommendations for strategies that would be effective at taking on and winning against the large multinational corporations that dominate the manufacturing sector. This report summarizes the findings from our research. The first section, Part I, examines changes that have occurred in manufacturing industries over the last five years in employment, union membership, union density, workforce demographics, and trade and investment relative to changes in other sectors and industries. Part II presents summary data for all NLRB elections in the last five years, comparing changes in certification election activity and outcomes in manufacturing industries relative to changes in other sectors and industries. In this section we also analyze NLRB election activity in the context of the changes in employment, union density, workforce demographics, and trade and investment summarized in Part I.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kate Bronfenbrenner et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Successful Union Strategies for Winning Certification Elections and First Contracts: Report to Union Participants (Part 1: Organizing Survey Results)</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/46</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/46</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:39:16 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Summary of results from 1986-1988 survey of 261 lead organizers conducted by Kate Bronfenbrenner in cooperation with the Organizing Department of the AFL-CIO.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kate Bronfenbrenner</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Successful Union Strategies for Winning Certification Elections and First Contracts: Report to Union Participants (Part 2: First Contract Survey Results)</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/45</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/45</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:37:12 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Summary of results from 1986-1988 survey of 100 chief negotiators conducted by Kate Bronfenbrenner in cooperation with the Organizing Department of the AFL-CIO.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kate Bronfenbrenner</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Alternative Dispute Resolution [ADR] for Workers Compensation in Collective Bargaining Agreements: An Overview</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/44</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/44</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:23:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper addresses the argued benefits for cost savings and efficiency of alternative dispute resolution [ADR] procedures for workers compensation. Particular focus is on legislative “carve-outs” that authorize collectively-bargained ADR procedures for the construction industry in New York and other states.</p>
<p>Given the particular pressure to contain rising workers’ compensation costs—and the burden that these costs represent for the construction industry— ADR procedures are one of the most important advantages of unionized construction and, in particular, Project Labor Agreements [PLAs].   The negotiated alternative procedures, subject to Workers’ Compensation Board [WCB] approval, use an expedited and non-adversarial process that can potentially save considerable project time and costs.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Fred B. Kotler</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Joint Labor-Management Training Programs for Healthcare Worker Advancement and Retention</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/43</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/43</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:42:56 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] Filling vacancies and retaining workers in shortage areas such as nursing and other allied health occupations remains a challenge in today’s healthcare industry. At the same time, low-wage workers in the healthcare industry often lack the educational credentials necessary to move into higher-paying occupations. This study seeks to understand the role of multi-employer joint labor-management healthcare worker training in meeting the needs of employers for career ladder advancement in their incumbent workforce. The study focuses on hospital employers and their experience with strategies for the advancement of low-wage and entry level workers into healthcare career pathways.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Sally Klingel et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Passenger Air Service in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula: Overview and Analysis</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/42</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/42</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:38:27 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] Rural America needs safe, efficient, reliable, and accessible passenger air service. Federal government subsidies have long been necessary to assure that residents in smaller, less profitable markets have access to the nation’s transportation network. That access is necessary for a community’s economic health, is arguably a right of all taxpayers and residents, and is in public interest. But market forces within the aviation industry are today driving a restructuring that may curtail or eliminate service to many communities in the nation. And the present political climate raises a serious question about the federal government’s continued commitment to the nation’s rural air transportation system.</p>
<p>This report focuses on the state of passenger air service in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula [U.P.]. The U.P. is among the most geographically remote areas in the eastern half of the United States. The region’s economic, social, and cultural institutions are increasingly related to a global marketplace. These depend, in varying degrees, on access to the national and global transportation network. Scheduled, commercial passenger air service is especially critical for this area too distant from passenger rail, without adequate commercial bus service, with few four-lane highways and very limited connection to the Interstate Highway system.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Fred B. Kotler</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Demystifying Endowments</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/41</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/41</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:49:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] This year, decreases in the financial markets and reported large declines in the values of endowments at many institutions have led to numerous reports about how colleges and universities are slashing budgets, freezing faculty and staff salaries, cutting faculty and staff employment levels (often by attrition, but sometimes by layoff), and slowing down or stopping building projects. In spite of all of this attention there is a general lack of understanding regarding endowments—what they are, how they are used, how they are invested and the investments managed, how decisions are made regarding how much to spend from them, and why the reported declines in endowment values are having such profound effects on higher education. This paper addresses such issues.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Ronald G. Ehrenberg</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Does America Face a Shortage of Scientists and Engineers?</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/40</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/40</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:32:37 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] As someone who served on the committee that issued the 1998 study of the early careers of life scientists that Teitelbaum talks about in his article and who has critiqued models that projected shortages of new PhDs, I am very sympathetic to many of the points that he makes (National Research Council, 1998; Ehrenberg, 1991). What I want to focus on today is the word we in his title, because, as Teitelbaum emphasizes, the question of shortages or surpluses is often in the eye of the beholder. For example, from the perspective of faculty members involved in the academic enterprise, increased research project budgets lead to increased demand for graduate research assistants and postdoctoral fellows. Each faculty member wants to maximize his own research output, and concern about future employment prospects for one's students often falls by the wayside.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Ronald G. Ehrenberg</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Impact of U.S.-China Trade Relations on Workers, Wages, and Employment: Pilot Study Report</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/39</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/39</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:15:16 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] In the fall of 2000, legislation was enacted by the U.S. Congress to establish a bipartisan commission to investigate, assess, and report to Congress on the economic and security implications of the bilateral economic relationship between the U.S. and China. Unfortunately, to date no government body in the U.S. has had the responsibility for collecting comprehensive national data on the wage and employment effects of trade agreements and policies. Because of this deficit of information, the U.S. Trade Deficit Review Commission contracted with a team of researchers from Cornell University and the University of Massachusetts Amherst to conduct a pilot study to lay the groundwork for more comprehensive research to monitor and analyze the impact of U.S.-China trade relations on workers, wages, and employment in the U.S. The purpose of the pilot study was twofold. The first component involved designing and implementing a media-tracking system to monitor and analyze media coverage of the employment and wage effects of China trade and investment by tracking all media reported production shifts out of the U.S. to China, Mexico, and other Asian and Latin American countries and out of Asian and Latin American countries into China that occurred between October 1, 2000 and April 30, 2001. Because of the lack of government data in this area, the media-tracking study is the first and only national database on production shifts out of the U.S. The second component of the study involved collecting and analyzing macro data on imports, exports, and foreign direct investment in those industries and economic sectors that have an active trade, investment, and production relationship with China. In combination, findings from the media-tracking and macroeconomic data provide further evidence that U.S.-China trade and investment policies have had, and will continue to have, a significant impact on employment and wages for workers in the U.S. and other countries actively involved in trade and/or investment with China. The study also lays the groundwork for future research on the economic impact of U.S-China trade relationships and demonstrates the importance of government-mandated corporate reporting requirements for all companies shifting goods, investments, or production in and out of the U.S<strong>.</strong></p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kate Bronfenbrenner et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>No Holds Barred: The Intensification of Employer Opposition to Organizing</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/38</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/38</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:56:09 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] This study is a comprehensive analysis of employer behavior in representation elections supervised by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The data for this study originate from a thorough review of primary NLRB documents for a random sample of 1,004 NLRB certification elections that took place between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2003 and from an in-depth survey of 562 campaigns conducted with that same sample. Employer behavior data from prior studies conducted over the last 20 years are used for purposes of comparison. The representativeness of the sample combined with the high response rate for both the survey (56%) and NLRB unfair labor practice (ULP) charge documents (98%) ensure that the findings provide unique and highly credible information. In combination, the results provide a detailed and well-documented portrait of the legal and illegal tactics used by employers in NLRB representational elections and of the ineffectiveness of current labor law policy to protect and enforce workers rights in the election process.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kate Bronfenbrenner</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Trade and Labour Standards: A Review of the Issues</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/37</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/37</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:04:30 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] This is a paper by a labour economist for trade specialists. It is written at a time of hope tempered by fear. On the trade side, the hope is that the new World Trade Organisation will stimulate a better trading environment for all countries. On the labour side, the hope is that labour standards can continually be improved for most if not all of the world's working people. But there are also fears. One fear is that these goals may be difficult to achieve simultaneously. Another is that they may be undone by various pressures, including issues left unresolved in the Uruguay Round of the GATT.</p>
<p>Trade and labour market policies are continuously being discussed and reformulated. Strangely enough, much of this debate takes place in the absence of clearly-articulated goals. The reasons, it would seem, are twofold. On the one hand, for some analysts, the goals (e.g. freer trade, workers' rights) are held to be self-evident. On the other hand, the goals are themselves sometimes hard to pinpoint. When does "free trade" give way to "fair trade"? When does the pursuit of one labour standard (e.g. free collective bargaining) take precedence over another (e.g. full employment)?</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gary S. Fields</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Project Labor Agreements in New York State II: In the Public Interest and of Proven Value</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/36</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/36</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:29:08 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] This report is a follow-up to the earlier Cornell ILR report, Project Labor Agreements in New York State: In the Public Interest, issued in March 2009. There has been a significant increase in the authorization and use of PLAs for both public and private sector work during the intervening two years – particularly for New York City and, generally, throughout New York State. PLAs now govern the labor relations for a broad scope of projects involving tens of billions of dollars of infrastructure, new construction, and renovation work. The current report details how and why these agreements are serving the interests of taxpayers, businesses, communities, as well as the construction industry and workforce.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Fred B. Kotler J.D.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>A Social Dimension for Transatlantic Economic Relations</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/35</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/35</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:55:44 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Transatlantic Economic Relations (TER) was neglected by politi¬cians for much of the twentieth century as international security issues took priority. Since the end of the Cold War, however, and as economic issues have come to prominence TER has assumed increasing importance and yet is largely overlooked in academic discussion. This report places TER in its historical context and demonstrates how the political agenda and institutional setup are both largely dysfunctional. Viewed through the prism of industrial relations and drawing on some real life examples from both sides of the Atlantic, it argues that the social dimension is a challenge central to the future development of the relationship and proposes institutional innovations which could also be replicated in other areas: for instance in support of environmental concerns. Presenting some guiding principles for transatlantic trade, this paper recommends the creation of a new secretariat to act as a permanent contact point and providing a variety of practical functions essential to making TER work.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lance A. Compa et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Justice for All: The Struggle for Worker Rights in Mexico</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/34</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/34</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:34:45 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] The Solidarity Center is launching a new series, <i>Justice for All: The Struggle for Worker Rights</i>. This series follows the May 2003 publication of the Solidarity Center’s groundbreaking <i>Justice for All: A Guide to Worker Rights in the Global Economy</i>. Through powerful first-person narratives, the reports thoroughly examine worker rights, country by country, in today’s global economy.</p>
<p>This first report, by renowned worker rights researcher Lance Compa, takes a hard look at Mexico’s century-long fight for independent, democratic trade unions and social justice. Compa puts Mexico’s labor law and practice to the test against international worker rights standards reflected in International Labor Organization conventions and the ILO’s 1998 Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lance A. Compa</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Justice for All: The Struggle for Worker Rights in China</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/33</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/33</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:32:04 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] In this report from the Solidarity Center series <i>Justice for All: The Struggle for Worker Rights</i>, a team of researchers and experts led by Cornell University’s Lance Compa examines the status of worker rights in China—the global giant whose nearly 800 million workers represent one-fourth of the world’s labor force. <i>Justice for All: The Struggle for Worker Rights in China</i> holds China’s labor law and practice up to international standards enshrined in International Labor Organization conventions and the ILO’s 1998 Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lance A. Compa</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Justice for All: The Struggle for Worker Rights in Sri Lanka</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/32</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/32</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:29:28 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] In this second report of the series, renowned worker rights researcher Lance Compa assesses the damage that nearly two decades of civil war have wrought on Sri Lanka’s fragile democracy, economy, and social justice framework. Compa puts Sri Lanka’s labor law and practice to the test against international worker rights standards enshrined in International Labor Organization conventions and the ILO’s 1998 Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lance A. Compa</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Workers in the Global Economy</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/31</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/31</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:26:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] The Workers in the Global Economy project is part of a growing international labor rights movement. This movement brings together researchers, policy analysts, and advocates in trade unions and allied NGOs who want to make social justice the touchstone of an integrated international economy. Participants in the WGE project hope it contributes new understanding of the global economy and how it affects workers. More important, we hope that it gives labor rights advocates tools to change the effects of globalization on working people around the world.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Pharis Harvey et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Plant closings and labor rights</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/30</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/30</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:54:03 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] This report by the Secretariat of the Commission for Labor Cooperation responds to a request from the Council of Ministers for a study of the effects of plant closings on the principle of freedom of association and the right to organize in the three countries that negotiated the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC).</p>
<p>In February 1996, the Council of Ministers called for this report following ministerial consultations initiated by Mexico on a plant closing that occurred in the United States during a union organizing campaign. This is the first special report by the Secretariat under Article 14 of the NAALC, which provides for special reports on "any matter as the Council may request."</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>John McKennirey et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Employment Relations Matters</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/29</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/29</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:17:39 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>[Excerpt] This text deals with issues that, traditionally, have appeared under labels such as ‘industrial relations’, ‘human resource management’ and ‘employee relations’. It adopts ‘employment relations’ as its title for two main reasons. The first is that it accurately describes what the text is about – it’s about the employment relationship, the institutions involved in its ‘governance’ and the impact on a wide range of economic and social outcomes. The second is that it’s increasingly difficult to use the traditional labels without causing confusion. Regardless of intention, ‘industrial relations’ is associated with trade unions, collective bargaining and strikes, while 'human resource management' and 'employee relations' are seen as being about managing relations with individual employees. It also seems that there is to be no meeting on the ideological plain – ‘industrial relations’ is assumed to be conflict-based, while ‘human resource management’ and ‘employee relations’ are said to be ‘unitarist’ and ‘managerialist’ in their approach. Meanwhile, ever-increasing fragmentation means that the area’s overall significance gets lost sight of.</p>
<p>The text has the double intention that I’ve tried to capture in the title: to bring people up to date with the matters that the study of employment relations deals with and to explain why they matter. Trade unions and collective bargaining certainly feature – collective bargaining remains the dominant way of settling the pay and conditions of employment of employees in many EU countries; the same is true of the six million or so public sector employees in the UK. Employment relations is far from being just about trade unions and collective bargaining, however. It is also about work organisation – the nature and extent of managerial hierarchies and control structures, which have profound implications for health, personal development and a country's social capital stock; personnel policies and practices, which are critical not just for business performance, but also income levels, life chances, the family (the duration, distribution and flexibility of working time are especially important here) and the development of human and social capital (reflecting not just the nature and extent of continuing vocational training but also the opportunities for on-the-job learning and personal development); and the decisions of government and the judiciary (reflecting the state’s role as ‘guarantor of the employment relationship’). It is no exaggeration to say that many of the objectives policy makers subscribe to – ending child poverty, enhancing the quality of family life, improving health, increasing social mobility and building a knowledge economy – depend to a very large extent on the quality of employment relations.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Keith Sisson</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Women and Union Leadership in the UK and USA: First Findings From a Cross-National Research Project</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/28</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/28</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:15:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This is a report prepared for Cornell Conference on Women and Union Leadership held at Cornell University, New York City on May 8th 2010 and for Queen Mary/SERTUC Workshop on Women and Union Leadership held at Congress House, London on 11th September 2010. The project was funded by the Leverhulme Trust.</p>
<p>[Excerpt] This report offers the first findings of a unique comparative research project on women in union leadership in the UK and the USA. It is the first study that seeks to systematically investigate the experiences of women in union leadership in two countries using the same research methodologies and carried out by an American/British research team.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gill Kirton et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
