[Excerpt] Dan Swinney's response to my article is flawed in three respects. First, Dan doesn't adequately address the theoretical arguments and empirical data I presented to support my position. Second, he misrepresents my views at several points in his article. Third, his notion of worker ownership as a tactic begs the question of what sort of strategy or general direction the labor movement needs.
"Debate: Reply to Swinney,"
Labor Research Review:
6, Article 1.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/lrr/vol1/iss6/1