Publication Date

January 1994

Abstract

This paper tests three competing hypotheses on the relative importance of distributive and procedural justice in predicting satisfaction with productivity gainsharing. The analysis provides support for one of the hypotheses, which states that the payout will determine which type of fairness (procedural or distributive) is more predictive of gainsharing satisfaction.

Comments

Suggested Citation
Welbourne, T. M. (1994). The role of distributive and procedural justice in predicting gainsharing satisfaction (CAHRS Working Paper #94-02). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp/227

Share

COinS